Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: experience at an epilepsy centre.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Estereoelectroencefalografía en la evaluación prequirúrgica de epilepsias focales refractarias: experiencia de un centro de epilepsia / Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: Experience at an epilepsy centre

Objetivo: La estereoelectroencefalografía (E-EEG) es una técnica de evaluación prequirúrgica en pacientes con epilepsia focal refractaria de difícil localización (EFRDL) que permite explorar con electrodos profundos regiones cerebrales de difícil acceso y la profundidad de la corteza. Esta técnica, en auge en centros internacionales, apenas se ha desarrollado en España. Describimos nuestra experiencia con la E-EEG en la evaluación de pacientes con EFRDL. Material y métodos: En los últimos 8 años, 71 pacientes con EFRDL fueron evaluados con E-EEG en nuestro centro. Analizamos prospectivamente los resultados obtenidos en la localización, los resultados quirúrgicos y las complicaciones asociadas a la técnica. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 30 años (rango 4-59 años), 27 pacientes eran mujeres (38%). La RM cerebral fue negativa en 45 pacientes (63,4%). Se implantaron 627 electrodos (mediana de 9 electrodos por paciente, rango 1-17), con un 50% de implantaciones multilobares. En 64 (90,1%) pacientes se localizó la zona epileptógena (ZE), siendo extratemporal o temporal plus en el 66% de los casos. En 55 pacientes de los 61 intervenidos el seguimiento fue superior al año: en el último año de seguimiento 32/55 pacientes (58,2%) estaban libres de crisis (Engel I) siendo los resultados favorables (Engel I-II) en el 76,4% de las intervenciones. Tres pacientes (4,2%) presentaron una hemorragia cerebral. Conclusión: La E-EEG permite localizar la ZE en pacientes en quienes anteriormente no era posible, ofreciendo unos resultados quirúrgicos superiores a otras técnicas invasivas y una tasa de complicaciones relativamente baja. (AU)

Objective: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. Material and methods: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. Results: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. Conclusion: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications. (AU)

Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: Experience at an epilepsy centre. / Estereoelectroencefalografía en la evaluación prequirúrgica de epilepsias focales refractarias: experiencia de un centro de epilepsia.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a technique for preoperative evaluation of patients with difficult-to-localise refractory focal epilepsy (DLRFE), enabling the study of deep cortical structures. The procedure, which is increasingly used in international epilepsy centres, has not been fully developed in Spain. We describe our experience with SEEG in the preoperative evaluation of DLRFE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the last 8 years, 71 patients with DLRFE were evaluated with SEEG in our epilepsy centre. We prospectively analysed our results in terms of localisation of the epileptogenic zone (EZ), surgical outcomes, and complications associated with the procedure. RESULTS: The median age of the sample was 30 years (range, 4-59 years); 27 patients (38%) were women. Forty-five patients (63.4%) showed no abnormalities on brain MR images. A total of 627 electrodes were implanted (median, 9 electrodes per patient; range, 1-17), and 50% of implantations were multilobar. The EZ was identified in 64 patients (90.1%), and was extratemporal or temporal plus in 66% of the cases. Follow-up was over one year in 55 of the 61 patients undergoing surgery: in the last year of follow-up, 58.2% were seizure-free (Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale class I) and 76.4% had good outcomes (Engel I-II). Three patients (4.2%) presented brain haemorrhages. CONCLUSION: SEEG enables localisation of the EZ in patients in whom this was previously impossible, offering better surgical outcomes than other invasive techniques while having a relatively low rate of complications.

Neuroimagen en demencia. Correlación clínico-radiológica / Neuroimaging in dementia. Clinical-radiological correlation

La demencia es un síndrome caracterizado por un deterioro cognitivo crónico, adquirido, multidominio y que produce limitaciones funcionales significativas. La RM estructural es el estudio de imagen de elección en estos casos, dado que permite detectar los patrones de atrofia propios de las distintas enfermedades neurodegenerativas (enfermedad de Alzheimer, degeneración frontotemporal, demencia con cuerpos de Lewy), las lesiones vasculares asociadas a las demencias vasculares y varias patologías potencialmente reversibles (p.ej. tumores, hidrocefalia) o que requieren medidas de manejo especiales (p.ej. enfermedades priónicas). En casos seleccionados pueden utilizarse otros métodos de imagen, tales como la TC, la RM funcional, el SPECT con HMPAO o marcadores dopaminérgicos y el PET con FDG, marcadores de amiloide o marcadores dopaminérgicos. Las indicaciones de estos métodos no están aún bien establecidas, con lo que conviene utilizarlos en el contexto de unidades de demencia multidisciplinares

Dementia is a syndrome characterised by chronic, multi-domain, acquired cognitive impairment that causes significant functional limitations. MRI is the standard imaging study for these cases, since it enables detection of the atrophy patterns of the various neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal degeneration, Lewy body dementia), the vascular lesions associated with vascular dementia, and various potentially reversible diseases (for example, tumours, hydrocephaly) or diseases that require special management measures (for example, prion diseases). In certain cases other imaging methods can be used, such as CT, functional MRI, HMPAO SPECT or dopaminergic markers and FDG PET, amyloid markers or dopaminergic markers. The indications for these methods have not yet been clearly established, and therefore should be used in multidisciplinary dementia units

Neuroimaging in dementia. Clinical-radiological correlation. / Neuroimagen en demencia. Correlación clínico-radiológica.

Dementia is a syndrome characterised by chronic, multi-domain, acquired cognitive impairment that causes significant functional limitations. MRI is the standard imaging study for these cases, since it enables detection of the atrophy patterns of the various neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal degeneration, Lewy body dementia), the vascular lesions associated with vascular dementia, and various potentially reversible diseases (for example, tumours, hydrocephaly) or diseases that require special management measures (for example, prion diseases). In certain cases other imaging methods can be used, such as CT, functional MRI, HMPAO SPECT or dopaminergic markers and FDG PET, amyloid markers or dopaminergic markers. The indications for these methods have not yet been clearly established, and therefore should be used in multidisciplinary dementia units.

Validez de las escalas clínicas y de contenido del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota-2 para el diagnóstico de crisis no epilépticas psicógenas / Validity of the clinical and content scales of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Introducción: La utilidad del Inventario Multifásico de Personalidad de Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) para el diagnóstico de crisis no epilépticas psicógenas (CNEP) es controvertida. Este estudio analiza la validez de las escalas clínicas y, a diferencia de trabajos previos, las escalas de contenido. Métodos: Estudio transversal de 209 pacientes atendidos en la unidad de epilepsia. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística tomando como prueba de referencia la vídeo-electroencefalografía y como variables predictoras edad, sexo, cociente intelectual y las escalas clínicas (modelo A) o de contenido (modelo B) del MMPI-2. Los modelos se seleccionaron según el índice de Aikake y se compararon con el test de DeLong. Resultados: Se analizó a 37 pacientes con CNEP solas o combinadas con crisis epilépticas y 172 pacientes solo con crisis epilépticas. El modelo A, compuesto por sexo, hipocondría (Hs) y paranoia (Pa), mostró una sensibilidad del 77,1%, una especificidad del 76,8%, un porcentaje de clasificación correcta del 76,8% y un área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0,836 para el diagnóstico de CNEP. El modelo B, compuesto por sexo, preocupación por la salud (HEA) y miedos (FRS), mostró una sensibilidad del 65,7%, una especificidad del 78,0%, un porcentaje de clasificación correcta del 75,9% y un AUC de 0,840. El test de DeLong no detectó diferencias significativas. Conclusiones: El MMPI-2 presenta una validez moderada para el diagnóstico de CNEP en los pacientes remitidos a una unidad de epilepsia. El uso de las escalas de contenido no mejora de forma significativa los resultados obtenidos con las escalas clínicas

Introduction: The use of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is controversial. This study examines the validity of the clinical scales and, unlike previous works, the content scales. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 209 patients treated in the epilepsy unit. We performed a logistic regression analysis, taking video-electroencephalography as the reference test, and as predictor variables age, sex, IQ and clinical (model A) or content scales (model B) of the MMPI-2. The models were selected according to the Aikake index and compared using the DeLong test. Results: We analyzed 37 patients with PNES alone, or combined with seizures, and 172 patients with seizures only. The model consisting of sex, Hs (hypochondriasis) and Pa (paranoia) showed a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 76.8%, a percentage of correct classification of 76.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 for diagnosing CNEP. Model B, consisting of sex, HEA (health concerns) and FRS (fears), showed a sensitivity of 65.7%, a specificity of 78.0%, a percentage of correct classification of 75.9% and an AUC of 0.840. DeLong's test did not detect significant differences. Conclusions: The MMPI-2 has a moderate validity for the diagnosis of PNES in patients referred to an epilepsy unit. Using content scales does not significantly improve results from the clinical scales

Validity of the clinical and content scales of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.

INTRODUCTION: The use of the Multiphasic Personality Inventory Minnesota 2 (MMPI-2) for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) is controversial. This study examines the validity of the clinical scales and, unlike previous works, the content scales. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 209 patients treated in the epilepsy unit. We performed a logistic regression analysis, taking video-electroencephalography as the reference test, and as predictor variables age, sex, IQ and clinical (model A) or content scales (model B) of the MMPI-2. The models were selected according to the Aikake index and compared using the DeLong test. RESULTS: We analyzed 37 patients with PNES alone, or combined with seizures, and 172 patients with seizures only. The model consisting of sex, Hs (hypochondriasis) and Pa (paranoia) showed a sensitivity of 77.1%, a specificity of 76.8%, a percentage of correct classification of 76.8%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.836 for diagnosing CNEP. Model B, consisting of sex, HEA (health concerns) and FRS (fears), showed a sensitivity of 65.7%, a specificity of 78.0%, a percentage of correct classification of 75.9% and an AUC of 0.840. DeLong's test did not detect significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The MMPI-2 has a moderate validity for the diagnosis of PNES in patients referred to an epilepsy unit. Using content scales does not significantly improve results from the clinical scales.

Utilidad de la resonancia magnética cerebral con secuencia de difusión y valor b alto en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob / Usefulness of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

Introducción: los criterios diagnósticos actuales de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob (ECJ) probable incluyen la combinación de datos clínicos, electroencefalográficos y analíticos. En los últimos años se ha demostrado que la RM craneal con el uso de secuencias FLAIR y difusión (DWI) puede ser una herramienta útil en el diagnóstico de esta enfermedad. Describimos nuestra experiencia en la utilización de la DWI convencional (b: 1000s/mm2) y DWI con valor b alto (3000s/mm2) en el diagnóstico de la ECJ probable o definitiva. Pacientes y métodos: realizamos un análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes atendidos en nuestro hospital diagnosticados de ECJ probable o definitiva, desde el año 2002 al 2008. A todos ellos se les realizó una RM craneal con un protocolo que incluyó secuencias potenciadas en T1, T2, FLAIR y dos secuencias DWI, una con valor b convencional (1000s/mm2) y otra con valor b alto (3000s/mm2). Resultados: se atendieron a 7 pacientes con diagnóstico de ECJ probable o definitiva. En tres de ellos (43%) la secuencia FLAIR mostró cambios de señal compatibles con ECJ. En todos los pacientes en la secuencia DWI con valor b alto se observaron alteraciones características de la enfermedad, incluyendo dos casos (28%) en los que todas las secuencias realizadas, incluida la DWI convencional, fueron normales. Adicionalmente en los 7 casos (100%) las alteraciones radiológicas fueron más fáciles de identificar y más extensas con valores altos b de DWI (AU). Conclusión: la utilización de un valor b alto (3000s/mm2) en la secuencia DWI puede aumentar la sensibilidad de la RM craneal en el diagnóstico de la ECJ, permitiendo la detección de casos en los que la DWI convencional es normal

Background: current diagnostic criteria of probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) include a combination of clinical, EEG and analytic data. Recent data indicate that brain MRI including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences can be a valid and reliable tool for the diagnosis of CJD. We describe our experience with high b-value (3000s/mm2) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with probable or definite CJD and compare it with standard b-value (1000s/mm2) DWI. Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our Hospital Service between 2002 and 2008 with a final diagnosis of probable or definite CJD. Patients were examined using either a 1.5 Tesla or a 3 Tesla MRI. The MRI protocol included T1-weigthed spin-echo sequences, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, FLAIR and DWI sequences with high b-value and standard b-value. Results: during the study period there were 7 patients with probable or definite CJD. Only 3 patients (43%) showed changes on FLAIR sequence consistent with CJD. All the cases were detected with high b-value DWI, including 2 cases (28%) that would have been missed using standard b-value (1000s/mm2) DWI. In all the patients the changes were more conspicuous and extensive at high b-value DWI (b=3000s/mm2). Conclusion;: our data indicate that high b-value DWI may improve the sensitivity of brain MRI for the diagnosis of CJD, allowing the detection of some cases that would have been overlooked by conventional sequences (AU)

Usefulness of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

BACKGROUND: current diagnostic criteria of probable Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) include a combination of clinical, EEG and analytic data. Recent data indicate that brain MRI including fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences can be a valid and reliable tool for the diagnosis of CJD. We describe our experience with high b-value (3000s/mm(2)) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with probable or definite CJD and compare it with standard b-value (1000s/mm(2)) DWI. METHODS: we performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our Hospital Service between 2002 and 2008 with a final diagnosis of probable or definite CJD. Patients were examined using either a 1.5 Tesla or a 3 Tesla MRI. The MRI protocol included T1-weigthed spin-echo sequences, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, FLAIR and DWI sequences with high b-value and standard b-value. RESULTS: during the study period there were 7 patients with probable or definite CJD. Only 3 patients (43%) showed changes on FLAIR sequence consistent with CJD. All the cases were detected with high b-value DWI, including 2 cases (28%) that would have been missed using standard b-value (1000s/mm(2)) DWI. In all the patients the changes were more conspicuous and extensive at high b-value DWI (b=3000s/mm(2)). CONCLUSION: our data indicate that high b-value DWI may improve the sensitivity of brain MRI for the diagnosis of CJD, allowing the detection of some cases that would have been overlooked by conventional sequences.

[Usefulness of the 14-3-3 test for the diagnosis of sCJD evaluated by a Spanish reference center]. / Utilidad del inmunoensayo de la proteína 14-3-3 en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob examinada desde un centro de referencia nacional.

INTRODUCTION: The performance of the 14-3-3 protein test has been shown to be adequate for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) diagnosis in selected populations, but its routine validity has been questioned. METHODS: One thousand and sixty-eight patients with clinically suspected sCJD were analyzed in a Spanish reference center. In order to explore the influence of the clinical context on the performance of the immunoassay, the patients were classified at sample reception according to the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria excluding the 14-3-3 test results. The yield of the immunoassay was evaluated in each subgroup with criteria of probable, possible sCJD or non-sCJD. RESULTS: In the set of patients with suspicion of sCJD the inclusion of the 14-3-3 test produces a significant increase in the diagnosis certainty (positive likelihood ratio: 10.1) compared to the WHO's criteria, excluding the 14-3-3 test. For patients classified at sample reception as probable sCJD (n=166), possible sCJD (n=129) and non-sCJD (n=773), the positive predictive values for the test were 98.4%, 97.5% and 31%, and the negative predictive values were 22.2%, 73.4% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive values of the assay vary according to the previous diagnostic certainty. Therefore, in order to interpret correctly the test, it is necessary to evaluate the degree of initial clinical suspicion of the patient at the moment of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) extraction. This study offers up-to-date information, referenced to the Spanish population, and in useful format, and it is intended to serve as a guideline for 14-3-3 test results interpretation to the clinicians in our community.

Utilidad del inmunoensayo de la proteína 14-3-3 en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob examinada desde un centro de referencia nacional / Usefulness of the 14-3-3 test for the diagnosis of sCJD evaluated by a Spanish reference center

Introducción. El inmunoensayo de la proteína 14-3-3 en líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) muestra un rendimiento óptimo para el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Creutzfeldt- Jakob esporádica (ECJe) en poblaciones seleccionadas, pero su validez en la práctica rutinaria ha sido cuestionada. Método. Se estudiaron 1.068 pacientes con sospecha de ECJe procedentes de distintas instituciones españolas. Para explorar la influencia del contexto clínico sobre la validez del inmunoensayo los pacientes fueron clasificados en el momento de la recepción de la muestra de acuerdo con los criterios de certeza diagnóstica establecidos por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), excluyendo la prueba de la proteína 14-3-3. El rendimiento del immunoensayo se evaluó en cada subgrupo con criterios de ECJe probable, posible o no ECJe. Resultados. En el conjunto de pacientes con sospecha de ECJe la inclusión del inmunoensayo supone un aumento significativo en la certeza diagnóstica (razón de verosimilitud positiva: 10,1) sobre los criterios de la OMS sin incluir dicha prueba. En los subgrupos de pacientes clasificados a la recepción de la muestra como ECJe probable (n=166), ECJe posible (n=129) y no ECJe (n=773) los valores predictivos positivos de la prueba de la proteína 14-3-3 fueron 98,4, 97,5 y 31% y los valores predictivos negativos fueron 22,2, 73,4 y 100%, respectivamente. Conclusiones. Los valores predictivos de la prueba varían según el grado de certeza diagnóstica previa de cada paciente. Por ello, para interpretar correctamente el ensayo es necesario valorar el grado de sospecha clínica del paciente en el momento de la extracción del LCR. Este estudio pretende facilitar la interpretación de los resultados de la prueba de la proteína 14-3-3 a los especialistas clínicos, ofreciendo una información actualizada, referenciada a la población española y en formato de utilidad práctica (AU)

Introduction: The performance of the 14-3-3 protein test has been shown to be adequate for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) diagnosis in selected populations, but its routine validity has been questioned. Methods: One thousand and sixty-eight patients with clinically suspected sCJD were analyzed in a Spanish reference center. In order to explore the influence of the clinical context on the performance of the immunoassay, the patients were classified at sample reception according to the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria excluding the 14-3-3 test results. The yield of the immunoassay was evaluated in each subgroup with criteria of probable, possible sCJD or non-sCJD. Results: In the set of patients with suspicion of sCJD the inclusion of the 14-3-3 test produces a significant increase in the diagnosis certainty (positive likelihood ratio: 10.1) compared to the WHO's criteria, excluding the 14-3-3 test. For patients classified at sample reception as probable sCJD (n=166), possible sCJD (n=129) and non-sCJD (n=773), the positive predictive values for the test were 98.4%, 97.5% and 31%, and the negative predictive values were 22.2%, 73.4% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: The predictive values of the assay vary according to the previous diagnostic certainty. Therefore, in order to interpret correctly the test, it is necessary to evaluate the degree of initial clinical suspicion of the patient at the moment of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) extraction. This study offers up-to-date information, referenced to the Spanish population, and in useful format, and it is intended to serve as a guideline for 14-3-3 test results interpretation to the clinicians in our community (AU)

SUNCT syndrome: priming of symptomatic periods and worsening of symptoms by treatment with calcium channel blockers.

We report a SUNCT patient who showed both a precipitation and worsening of symptomatic periods after treatment with L-type calcium channel blockers. This pharmacological response may provide us with important clues for understanding the pathophysiology of SUNCT, and hopefully to find a remedy for the victims of this syndrome. This observation could also support a verapamil trial in SUNCT patients as a precipitating of attacks.

Senile dementia associated with amyloid beta protein angiopathy and tau perivascular pathology but not neuritic plaques in patients homozygous for the APOE-epsilon4 allele.

Amyloid beta protein deposition in cortical and leptomeningeal vessels, causing the most common type of cerebral amyloid angiopathy, is found in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is the principal feature in the hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis, Dutch type. The presence of the Apolipopriotein E (APOE)-epsilon4 allele has been implicated as a risk factor for AD and the development of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in AD. We report clinical, pathological and biochemical studies on two APOE-epsilon4 homozygous subjects, who had senile dementia and whose main neuropathological feature was a severe and diffuse amyloid angiopathy associated with perivascular tau neurofibrillary pathology. Amyloid beta protein and ApoE immunoreactivity were observed in leptomeningeal vessels as well as in medium-sized and small vessels and capillaries in the parenchyma of the neocortex, hippocampus, thalamus, cerebellum, midbrain, pons, and medulla. The predominant peptide form of amyloid beta protein was that terminating at residue Val40, as determined by immunohistochemistry, amino acid sequence and mass spectrometry analysis. A crown of tau-immunopositive cell processes was consistently present around blood vessels. DNA sequence analysis of the Amyloid Precursor Protein gene and Presenilin-1 (PS-1) gene revealed no mutations. In these APOE-epsilon4 homozygous patients, the pathological process differed from that typically seen in AD in that they showed a heavy burden of perivascular tau-immunopositive cell processes associated with severe amyloid beta protein angiopathy, neurofibrillary tangles, some cortical Lewy bodies and an absence of neuritic plaques. These cases emphasize the concept that tau deposits may be pathogenetically related to amyloid beta protein deposition.

Endogenous proteolytic cleavage of normal and disease-associated isoforms of the human prion protein in neural and non-neural tissues.

We have investigated the proteolytic cleavage of the cellular (PrPC) and pathological (PrPSc) isoforms of the human prion protein (PrP) in normal and prion-affected brains and in tonsils and platelets from neurologically intact individuals. The various PrP species were resolved after deglycosylation according to their electrophoretic mobility, immunoreactivity, Sarkosyl solubility, and, as a novel approach, resistance to endogenous proteases. First, our data show that PrPC proteolysis in brain originates amino-truncated peptides of 21 to 22 and 18 (C1) kd that are similar in different regions and are not modified by the PrP codon 129 genotype, a polymorphism that affects the expression of prion disorders. Second, this proteolytic cleavage of PrPC in brain is blocked by inhibitors of metalloproteases. Third, differences in PrPC proteolysis, and probably in Asn glycosylation and glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor composition, exist between neural and non-neural tissues. Fourth, protease-resistant PrPSc cores in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker F198S disease brains all have an intact C1 cleavage site (Met111-His112), which precludes disruption of a domain associated with toxicity and fibrillogenesis. Fifth, the profile of endogenous proteolytic PrPSc peptides is characteristic of each disorder studied, thus permitting the molecular classification of these prion diseases without the use of proteinase K and even a recognition of PrPSc heterogeneity within type 2 CJD patients having different codon 129 genotype and neuropathological phenotype. This does not exclude the role of additional factors in phenotypic expression; in particular, differences in glycosylation that may be especially relevant in the new variant CJD. Proteolytic processing of PrP may play an important role in the neurotropism and phenotypic expression of prion diseases, but it does not appear to participate in disease susceptibility.

Lipid composition of platelets in patients suffering from migraine without aura.

Patients with migraine have a platelet hyperaggregability. As this alteration could be the consequence of an abnormal lipid composition of platelet membranes, we studied the phospholipid specimens and the cholesterol/phospholipid ratio in platelet of neuron patients suffering from migraine. The cholesterol/phospholipid ratio was 0.7 +/- 0.1 (normal 0.6 +/- 0.1, molar ratio). The proportion of five main platelet phospholipids components including phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingomyelin, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylinositol, were also normal. These data suggest that platelet hyperactivity in patients with migraine is not due to an altered lipid content of those cells.